It comes as Fairfax Media revealed the T-shirts pulled by Aldi had been approved by the federal government.
It is unclear if the Big W shirts were also approved by the government.
Numerous objectionable bits in just two sentences. Starting with the minor ones:
“revealed the” should be “revealed that the”
“It is unclear if” should be “It is unclear whether”
More significantly, the reference to “federal government” is rather slipshod.
First, it should be (as is stated later in the article) a reference to a permission granted by DPMC (the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet) not the “government” itself.
Secondly, the article omits to mention that the approval occurred in July 2013 (i.e. the previous administration).
Thirdly, the article omits to mention what the approval was for. It says later:
The seven designs had been approved by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet in July 2013, under strict guidelines regarding products bearing the image of the Australian flag.
However, it appears likely that the approval would not have been for the content of the shirt per se, nor even for use of the flag on a commercial product. Rather, it seems likely that the “approval” was actually permission to import a product bearing the Australian flag under Customs legislation — suggesting that the shirts were made overseas. See this explanation (or the legislation itself).
If that is the case, then the “strict guidelines” in the quote relate to the import of the articles, not their content. The article rather suggests that the approval was as to the content, and that it was given by the present administration, which is a wholly different complexion.
“But the great thing has been that the team my GP assembled to check out the possibilities has moved Heaven and Earth to gather all the information I need quickly over the Christmas period … not an easy time. (sic)”
Think about it. We’re about to enter 2014. We have a world where you can stand in the middle of any major city — and, in many cases, places well-removed from any major city — holding a small device in your hand, with which you can:
not just talk, but video conference with multiple people on the other side of the world, simultaneously, with high quality and sharing a screen if needed
send or receive a digital file
record HD video and play it back, plus manipulate and edit it
take photos and manipulate and edit them
browse the web, on which can be found a significant fraction of everything ever written by mankind
pay your bills
write a novel
read a novel
listen to music
draw high quality pictures
see precisely where you are
see what is around you, including terrain information, maps and details about surrounding areas / businesses etc
touch a smooth piece of glass, and (ultimately) cause something to be sent to an address you nominate. That is to say, a few taps on a piece of glass in your hand will set in motion a chain of events where money will be taken from one of your accounts, and someone will either make or (more likely) deliver something from their inventory to the address you specify, usually by engaging the services of at least one other company
only have the above happen if you have your fingerprint recognised when you place it on a sensor pad.
Just think about it. Go back 10 years — to 2003, which feels like yesterday — and some of these things were possible. I remember the feeling of awe standing in the middle of a national park in New Zealand (while on holiday), without any signs of human presence visible save for the worn track on which I was standing, talking on my mobile phone with a friend in New York City.
Go back another 10 years — 1993, I remember you — and you could do parts of 1 (with a big bulky analogue mobile phone) and 7, 8 (e.g. on a Newton). Item 9 and 12, and parts of 3 and 4, were possible, with dedicated pieces of equipment.
Go back just 20 more years, to 1973, and the above would seem like magic. Arthur C Clarke’s adage that any technology, sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic is so true.
And things are just getting faster, smaller, lighter, and more capable.
Having done quite a bit of research, and having given some deep thought to the possible options, I ordered one of the new Mac Pros within 20 minutes of them becoming available. I expected they would sell out, and that was proved correct pretty quickly.
There were a few judgment calls and predictions, all of which turned out to be right. Given the large number of options available, here are my thoughts on choosing the best value machine from what is available (note – prices are in Australian dollars, and inc GST except where indicated).
There are 4 configurations:
Don’t be fooled by the on-paper clock speeds. So long as there is adequate cooling, turbo boost will let the “slower” (on paper) processors ramp up their speed when fewer cores are being used. See this great article from Marco.
The bottom line is that the 6 core will (if cooled properly) run at the same speed as the 4 core. with two more cores to boot. The 8 core is about a wash, but the 12 core is slower (by around 0.4-0.5GHz). The 6 core is the sweet spot for performance, unless you need more cores. The harder choice is between 4 and 6 cores; i.e. whether the amount Apple is asking (~$590 ex GST) would go further on other components.
I bet that the CPU, being a Xeon LGA2011 socket, would be upgradable in future; this turns out to have been correct. Once the price drops, and if needed, I may upgrade the CPU.
More press surrounding the gouging of Australian customers. When will there be adequate realisation that Apple is in a different position from Microsoft and Adobe?
The price of music, movies, TV and apps on the App Store is set by the content owner, not Apple. Apple just takes a cut. Apple’s own software is priced effectively at parity given the exchange rate and GST (or free).
“Fanboi” is a fairly common insult used by non- / anti-Mac users against those whom they perceive as having blind devotion to the Mac.
Yes, fanboyism exists for Macs, just as it does for many other products/pastimes/theories.
However, in a class of Mac users (namely, those who have been using Macs since at least the 90s) there is a sensible and defensible reason for why — if it exists — it does so. (Although, that said, in my experience the longer someone has been using Macs, the stronger the attachment but the less preachy the approach.)
I’ve been waiting for the new Mac Pro for well over a year now. I need to replace a souped-up but aged 2006 pro, which is hands down the best computer I’ve ever owned but is showing its age: it won’t go above OS X Lion, and it is noticeably slow, despite having everything internal upgraded.
For a while, I was concerned that Apple might drop the Pro altogether. While that fear was put to rest by Phil Schiller’s announcement, the new Mac Pro (as announced) is a curious beast that raises as many questions as it answers. While it is great to see a new machine, it gets some things very, very wrong.